Fire Alarm Companies

News webOS open source will come as a surprise, but the rhetoric Meg Whitman does not mean it's what to do

We strongly believe that the best days are yet to come webOS.

So Meg Whitman said in his

memo to the troops

, an interpretation of L announcement official HP intramural webOS that "contributed" to the open source community.

... management team worked to determine the best way forward for this software highly respected. We review all options on the market today ... By providing open source community webOS ... that have the potential to radically change the landscape.

Anyone who thinks we are stupid, or is ably insolent. Does she think we will fall into the corpospeak tired? "Victoria

WhatWereWeThinking v3.0

been released to the open source community." Or is it cleverly fessing up? "After a lot of abuse in the HP box, it Clearly, webOS can not be restored to health if released into the wild. "

launch a product as free software is not always an admission of failure

see exhibitions of Linux, or more recently , WebKit. However, the open source successful bid

created open source. They were not "contributed" in a last effort to save face after several unsuccessful attempts to get the benefits of a proprietary version.

addition, there is real money to be made with an open source product
- if you know what you do. Look at Red Hat: Although profitable, with a market capitalization of about $ 10b. They make a lot of money selling Linux - or, more precisely, for the sale of a Linux "distro", a set of products and services around the Linux kernel free. They make money the way iTunes: customers will not pay for the songs that are otherwise (more or less legal) available free, but they will pay for the services music
so open source is the way forward for webOS? I do not think so.

look at Symbian, a product that is similar to webOS as a complicated story:
Born in Psion, moved to a Nokia, Motorola, Ericsson, Matsushita , Psion joint venture, launched in open source Symbian Foundation, a joint venture even more complicated. Lately, things got even worse, as Symbian seems to have been "assigned to Accenture."
Adobe Flex is another kick to the curb, for example. When HTML5 seems to displace Flash, Adobe Flex open source official non-profit Apache Software Foundation.

Even the success of Firefox
Request open source certainly more visible, maybe not as indisputable that the first thought. With net assets of $ 120 million in late 2009, the "nonprofit" of the Mozilla Foundation, Firefox progenitor, was the great success of open source. 2009 revenue was U.S. $ 104 million, most of which were generated by sending Google to search the Firefox browser. In other words, Google was the father of Firefox sugar as Mountain View company battles Microsoft Internet Explorer quasi-monopoly.

But things have changed. Google Chrome is in its ascent, Google points for security holes in Firefox. Firefox is served at the pleasure of Google, but it is not necessary.
not exactly a bona fide success of open source.
(Ironically - or at least amusing - Meg Whitman said as an example of Firefox

success in open source

after Ad interview

technological references to add to the appearance, which was the HP Director, venture capitalist, Marc Andreessen and Netscape founder sits at his side. I will not dwell on the admission represents Andreessen trot.)

A closer examination of official statements from HP makes things even less clear:

. HP involving the open source community to help define the rules of Free source project into a set of operating principles:

be an active participant and investor in the project

. Good governance, transparent and inclusive to avoid fragmentation

. The software is provided as a pure open source project

Find best price for : --Googorola----Android----Andreessen----Marc----Netscape----Symbian----webOS--