Thursday, November 10, 2011

OpenDNS Tells Congress Not To Create The Great Firewall Of America

When I went to Washington DC last week with other entrepreneurs and venture capitalists, which I had the pleasure of knowing and walking the halls of Congress was David Ulevitch, CEO of OpenDNS, the DNS largest in the world and the security service on the Internet. Their service protects more than 30 million people every day, and is currently used to protect people in about one third of all public schools K-12. Listen to his story and his desire to protect intellectual property and the soup was very revealing. He is someone who clearly understands DNS and DNS / IP blocking probably better than anyone. And he said that if the soup was in place when he was the first to create OpenDNS, which would not have bothered. The liability is too great.

David wrote an open letter to Congress, we have incorporated, and then ask Congress to reject the soup and protect intellectual property as a very bad bill that will have consequences enormous adverse impact on the employment and security on the Internet at the same time. These are some excerpts:

is likely that if SOPA and PIPA was when I started my business which are incorporated outside the United States and all jobs and investment that I put into the economy would have been taken to another location
  1. . I hope that many companies make the decision to incorporate it in other places to pass this law and it is possible that existing businesses to relocate to the country more attractive to employers.
  2. My company has invented many techniques specific PIPA soup and require all Internet service providers and companies like mine to be used. Needless to say, to understand the technology of censure proposed in this legislation and we are deeply concerned
. While the objectives of protection of intellectual property and the reduction of piracy are noble, there are many reasons why the soup and are as dangerous PIPA currently writing. Here are three that particularly impact on my business:


will, by definition too broad, since there is no way to censor only illegal content, without affecting legitimate uses in places like that. This is especially true in light of the broad concept of "sites dedicated to the illegal activity."

Thanks to its demands to block Web sites, these bills will create a national Internet firewalls to censor Web pages is the "Great Firewall of China" is used to remove information.
If we implemented a solution that would be setting a terrible example for the rest of the world, including countries that have criticized for the same behavior as Iran, Syria and China.
They level companies with a heavy burden of responsibility for all content generated. What are the proposed bills would
similar to that required by the telephone company is responsible for the legality of all telephone calls. With this kind of regulation, companies spend more on lawyers and lawsuits that will be hiring and innovation. Existing laws, such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act already provide an adequate legal framework to eliminate copyright infringement and enforce intellectual property rights.

Find best price for : --Congress----firewall----Ulevitch----David----Washington--

0 comments:

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

About Me