Friday, February 15, 2013

How Would Twitter Handle A Crackdown On Free Speech In Saudi Arabia?

he was a strong advocate of freedom of expression, arguing that this is not just a matter of principle, but gives the company a competitive advantage. In defense of freedom of expression is good - not only for people but also for Twitter. There was a series of stories highlighting this aspect of Twitter in recent months, where the lead counsel of Twitter, Alex MacGillivray, said things like:
"We appreciate the reputation that we have to defend the user's voice," Macgillivray said in an interview at the headquarters of Twitter. "We believe it is important for our company and the way users think about whether to use Twitter, compared to other services. "
this in mind, it is interesting to see the amount of "freedom of expression" through Twitter has taken off in places like Saudi Arabia. The New York Times has an interesting discussion on how Twitter has become surprisingly open a channel for critics of the Saudi regime.

open criticism of the royal family in this country, once unheard of, has become common in recent months. Judges and lawyers public fierce volleys important question about government corruption and large-scale social neglect. Women make fun of clerics who limit their freedoms. Even the king is under attack.


all through Twitter. So far, the government has allowed this to continue - even as members of the royal family are often called directly and sometimes accused of corruption. Some believe that the government hopes to leave his Twitter fan people will continue in the streets. But there are always afraid that things can change and effective prosecution could be on the way.



And that could be a challenge for Twitter. Remember, last week, decided to block feed a neo-Nazi group in Germany Twitter. And there are also reports just released a bunch of anti-Semitic tweets potentially for periods of service violations. And this is worrying some people.
> Several Twitter users in the hashtag publication criticized the decision to remove the anti-Semitic messages, calling it censorship. A user name is Andr? said: "It is better to educate censorship .. Twitter shame "Another, Craig McLeod, asked:" Who decides what is anti-Semitic and abusive "
Given all this, as Mathew Ingram asked if and Saudi Arabia says suddenly his government faced criticism is illegal? Then what Twitter Does that decides the opening is something that wants to defend freedom of expression ... or enforce the law and the fund cut? Suddenly, the problem is much more difficult.
not know that there is an easy answer, but it seems that once you engage in a front, it becomes more difficult to justify a principled way ...
Find best price for : --Saudi----Arabia----Ingram----Mathew----Twitter--

0 comments:

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

About Me