Friday, February 22, 2013

AT&T Admits That The Whole 'Spectrum Crunch' Argument It Made For Why It Needed T-Mobile Wasn't True

Can remember when AT & T was trying to buy T-Mobile, much of the discussion was a contraction of the spectrum around its wireless efforts. The company insisted - strongly - that would not be able to expand 4G LTE services to more than 80% of the population if I did not have T-Mobile. This argument ran into problems when a lawyer accidentally sent some documents that the FCC has acknowledged that the company could easily extend its coverage to 97% of the U.S. population without T-Mobile (and, in fact, it would cost about 10% what you buy T-Mobile cost). Suddenly the argument that it is absolutely necessary for T-Mobile rang hollow - even though the company has continued to emphasize just that. However, the FCC suddenly skeptical and AT & T, see the writing on the wall, resigned from the merger.

probably would not have been considered a big surprise that

only 11 months
after T failed-Mobile, AT & T announced plans to expand its LTE footprint to cover 97% of the U.S. population. In other words, the internal document was quite right, and the public statements of AT & T? Nonsense.

Even the mainstream media mocks AT & T, patently false statements in the merger fight. AT & T's answer to this question is that "chartered a new direction," something like 40 new agreements on the spectrum. However, as pointed out by the reports broadband, it all seems clear that there is no spectrum crisis - it's just a story of a werewolf that telecommunications companies tell the government when they want to do charity. Indeed, AT & T said publicly that there is no spectrum crisis. It has more than enough.


Speaking to analysts, AT & T, Chief Strategy Officer John Stankey yesterday acknowledged the company is well positioned in front of the spectrum - even

before
society begins to move into its new plan to use the spectrum to deploy LTE WCS.
"Even under ideal circumstances, obtain a new spectrum to the market over the next five to seven years is aggressive," said Stankey. "But what we know is that AT & T is well positioned now ... These agreements give us confidence that we can achieve our goals of LTE for the next two years and allow us to offer a competitive return. "
course, I'm sure the next time that AT & T needed something from the government, or if you want to remove a competitor from the map, we return to the story of how he desperately needs the spectrum
Find best price for : --Stankey--

0 comments:

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

About Me