Saturday, February 23, 2013

$6.6 Million Ruling Against Lyrics Site, Once Again, Shows How Short Sighted Music Industry Is

For many years, we've covered how music publishers are gone after all sorts of sites that post the lyrics, alleging infringement. As we have repeatedly pointed out, it all seems extremely short. Lyrics sites of interest I take in a song, simply increase. And, yes, publishers have different interests in musicians or labels, but always seems to ask cons-productive and lower sites increased interest in music today, as sites letters are. Unfortunately, many sites have been forced disconnected letters because publishers want rates are crazy. A few years ago, a group of publishers were after LiveUniverse Brad Greenspan for their offer letters. Greenspan - who have teamed up with MySpace in the early days as CEO of its parent company Intermix - therefore has a colorful history. He spent many years with his feet pounding on the way Rupert Murdoch would have to pay more for MySpace back in the day.

Unfortunately, colorful and CEO extremes are not necessarily what you want in a trial involving a number of important issues. From the looks of it, Greenspan has done more damage to himself in this trial with their actions, so it is not surprising that he lost and was told to pay 6.6 million dollars a few weeks ago:


Greenspan went through three firms. A withdrawn, citing a "personality conflict." Another withdrew, citing nearly 85,000 in fees due and a "violation of the attorney-client relationship." Sometimes, appeared in court on behalf of himself and not follow proper procedures in filing motions. At other times, the evidence has been ignored in "medical emergencies."

Later, after the court ordered an injunction, Greenspan ignored - a big no-no. Accordingly, it is almost surprising that the final decision was only $ 6.6 million. judge, fortunately, more or less made for himself that the $ 100,000 per song that publishers have asked was crazy. has specifically requested that the license fee was real, "to avoid ridiculously disproportionate harm" - despite statutory damages require no indication of "real "damage. course, I still ended up with $ 12,500 per song for 528 songs, which causes 6.6 million judgment incorporated below.
whole affair, however, reminds us once more myopic existing players in the industry are. they seek cash

each use

even if these uses together more precious . The end result is a smaller number of people who engage with the lyrics. It's too expensive, and used to generate less interest in music as a whole. however, there is a brief period some control large publishers, and this seems to be the degree of strategic industries inherited today: "How can we get to get paid right now" instead of "what actually makes more sense?"
This may seem like overkill, but it is not. Remember, when now Sony Music (now Universal Music) chief Doug Morris has basically exactly this statement? When asked about the increase in value for the benefit of the same street, Morris responded by telling a reporter that it only means that:
"someone, somewhere advantage of you."

Find best price for : --music----CEOs----Greenspan--

0 comments:

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

About Me